Iran has refuted claims that a significant agreement with the United States is on the verge of completion, pointing out that while there has been progress in negotiations, several critical issues remain unsettled. Esmail Baghaei, the foreign ministry spokesperson, noted that although both parties have reached common ground on numerous points, predicting a final deal is still premature. He attributed the slowdown in the process to contradictory statements from Washington and interference from Israel.
A key element of the discussions is the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz for commercial shipping. Iran has clarified that it does not intend to impose tolls on ships; however, it may charge fees for navigational and environmental protection services in collaboration with Oman. Additionally, Iran has emphasized that any agreement should incorporate a ceasefire in Lebanon and the removal of restrictions on Iranian ports and shipping operations.
On the U.S. side, Secretary of State Marco Rubio affirmed that negotiations are ongoing and characterized the proposal under consideration as substantial. The framework reportedly involves a 30-day period post-ceasefire, during which Iran would clear mines from the Strait of Hormuz and reestablish full maritime access. Meanwhile, the U.S. military has confirmed conducting strikes in southern Iran, targeting missile launch sites and boats allegedly preparing to lay mines. Washington has described these actions as self-defense while continuing to support ceasefire efforts.
President Donald Trump has stated that the final agreement must be “great and meaningful,” or there would be no deal at all. He also called on several Middle Eastern countries to join the Abraham Accords and normalize relations with Israel, though reports suggest regional leaders have shown little interest. A sticking point in the talks is Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium. While Tehran has shown a willingness to temporarily reduce enrichment levels, it has rejected calls to transfer its uranium stockpile abroad. Moreover, Iran is seeking the release of billions of dollars in overseas frozen assets.
Iranian officials contend that internal political divisions within the U.S., including criticism from Congress and factions within the Republican Party, are exerting pressure on the White House and further complicating negotiations. The proposed agreement does not currently address Iran’s ballistic missile program or its support for regional armed groups, making it less comprehensive than previous U.S. demands.